ORLANDO, Fla. — The emails are full of potential damage for Hillary Clinton. She weighed the political implications of policies. She is close to Wall Street. Her aides gathered information to discredit a woman who’d accused her husband of rape. So how has she so far remained largely unscathed by the unprecedented release of hacked emails?…
1 thought on “Clinton’s WikiLeaks strategy: doubt, delay, distract”
Comments are closed.
It’s no wonder that the WikiLeaks are having little effect on Hillary. Large segment s of the population knows little to nothing about them. Here in Cincinnati we have only one newspaper, The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett publication. While the paper has run every rumor and allegation against Trump, it has not printed one word about Podesta’s emails, or Hillary’s. In fact, from the beginning of the campaign, it has printed little to nothing about Hillary that could be taken as negative. I suspect that this is true not only in Cincinnati, but most everywhere else, as well. If the press does not report, and the people do not learn about certain events, it is as if they never happened. The collusion of the press and Hillary’s campaign is obvious. Also, the allegation that Russia is responsible for the hacks is as credible as some obscure video being responsible for Benghazi, an allegation that was also promoted by this administration.
Jerome C Liner, Cincinnati, OH