Attack on J Street waste of resources

By Jeremy Ben-Ami

Jeremy Ben-Ami
Jeremy Ben-Ami

The majority of world Jewry agrees today: the future, security and character of the state of Israel all depend on reaching a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

That’s why Secretary of State John Kerry’s push to achieve it is perhaps the most vital pro-Israel initiative since Bill Clinton was President.

Right now, the fate of that effort hangs in the balance. With negotiations stalled, the effort could break down leading to a rapid growth in Israel’s international isolation and in efforts to pressure it through boycotts, divestment and the like.

Given the significant negative consequences that could follow failure, one might imagine that pro-Israel advocates would be screaming from the rooftops to do everything possible to help the talks succeed before it’s too late.

Yet instead of organizing to meet this existential threat, some on the far right of the American Jewish community are focusing their effort and their fire in a different direction – on members of their own community. In particular, there is a new well-funded and energetic campaign to defame and delegitimize J Street, centered on an hour-long attack-umentary called the “J Street Challenge.”

Sadly even a couple of mainstream, established Jewish organizations and figures are associating themselves with it – contrary to our community’s firm commitment to civil debate on issues of legitimate disagreement.

Those who’ve made the film and are hawking it are, however, missing the real challenges that J Street is posing to the Jewish community. Here are a few of them:

  • With the world losing patience with Israel’s policy toward the Palestinians, will we rally to urge the national homeland of our people to      change course before it loses its democracy or its Jewish character?
  • As the BDS Movement against Israel gains traction, will we recognize that the best way to defeat it isn’t spending our energy on preventing its      supporters from being heard, but on ending the conflict in two states for two peoples?
  • If you recognize the existential necessity of a two-state solution  for Israel to survive as a Jewish and democratic homeland, isn’t it time to acknowledge the price that has to be paid to achieve it? How can you we say you support a two-state solution but oppose establishing borders based on the pre-67 lines with land swaps? How can we say we support two states and oppose a Palestinian capital in the Arab neighborhoods of Jerusalem?
  • Is it appropriate to call those who criticize Israeli government policy anti-Israel or anti-Semitic? Plenty of Israelis including security chiefs, former Prime Ministers and Members of the Knesset are critical of present policy, and they’re certainly not anti-Israel. In fact, using the anti-Semitism label to describe criticism of Israeli policy demeans the horror of real anti-Semitism.
  • Is it right or smart to limit the right to speak in Jewish communal spaces to those with whom you agree? The more we limit admission to Jewish communal spaces by imposing ideological litmus tests regarding Israel, the smaller our Jewish community will be.
  • Are we, as a people, treating the Palestinian people the way we ourselves want to be treated? Are we living up to the moral standards of our people and have we learned the lessons of our own oppression through the centuries and across the globe?
  • Can we finally stop ignoring what is happening beyond the Green Line? The day-to-day maintenance of a 47-year occupation of another people      runs counter to the interests and values of Israel and the Jewish people. It places all the wonder and accomplishment of the state of Israel at      risk. It is time for the occupation to end.

We urge those attacking us to spend a little less time leveling baseless accusations against a now-established Jewish organization and a little more time addressing these fundamental challenges facing the Israel we love.

One participant in the “Challenge” movie, Daniel Gordis, recently did, and we had a wonderful, substantive discussion about all these critical issues. We didn’t change each others’ minds, but we provided food for thought for hundreds who came to hear us.

The possible failure of the Kerry mission is a disaster of epic proportions for the Jewish people and the state of Israel. That’s a challenge worthy of the time and effort of people like Alan Dershowitz and Charles Jacobs.

In Jewish communal venues here and across the globe, let’s call an end to the attack videos and mudslinging and let’s start discussing the significant challenges that really threaten not just Israel but the heart and the soul of the Jewish people.

*
Ben Ami is the founder of J Street, which provided this article.  San Diego Jewish World seeks sponsorships to be placed, as this notice is, just below articles that appear on our site.  This is an ideal opportunity for your corporate message or to personally remember a loved one’s contributions to our community.  To inquire, call editor Donald H. Harrison at (619) 265-0808 or contact him via donald.harrison@sdjewishworld.com

2 thoughts on “Attack on J Street waste of resources”

  1. Michael Hayutin, S.D. Chapter Leader, Act! For America, writes: “Contrary to Jeremy Ben Ami’s pleas, the attacks on J Street should expand with the goal of totally delegitimizing it as a pro-Israel organization. There is a reason that a recent pole indicated that 65% of Israelis distrust Secretary Kerry’s commitment to the security of Israel. His J Street approved ‘put pressure on Israel to make concessions’ formula for peace only serves to embolden the intransigence of Israel’s enemies.

    To this day Abbas will not recognize Israel as a secure Jewish State. Just last month the Arab League reiterated its’ “rejection of recognition of a Jewish State”.

    In U.N. General Assembly Resolution 181 that recognized Israel’s independence designated Israel as a “Jewish State”. Nothing could be more basic as the predicate to any negotiations then the clear recognition of very essence of Israel. Yet, our J Street friends require no such recognition from Israel’s enemies.

    Some say Abass has constituency problems with his open recognition of Israel. If true that only reinforces the notion that the Palestinians are not prepared for peace with a secure Jewish State.

    Here are a few inconvenient facts about J Street. It opposed sanctions against Iran. It opposed Israel’s defensive incursion into Gaza that followed years and thousands of missile attacks into Israel.

    Dozens of Arabs have made contributions to J Street, many associated with anti-Israel organizations.

    Genevieve Lynch, associated with the pro-Iranian regime National Iranian American Council has contributed to J Street.

    For years Mr. Ben-Ami lied about major funding from anti-Israeli currency manipulator George Soros. Finally, on September 26, 2010 he admitted his years of lying. Why pray tell would he feel the need to lie about a major benefactor?

    Don’t listen to me. Listen to the remarks of the last liberal, Alan Dershowitz. He offered J Street money if they would answer his questions about their positions on Iran. No answers were forthcoming.

    Why would J Street oppose vetoing a U.N resolution condemning Israel?

    I beg anyone who is or would ever plan on giving any moral or economic support to J Street to view a devastatingly compelling film titled, The J Street Challenge. http://thejstreetchallenge.com/

    Mr. Ben Ami says, “we want the conflict to end”. Gee and the rest of us want the conflict and bloodshed to continue. Please don’t be deceived by emotional appeals for peace. No one wants peace more than the Israelis. No one wants peace more than every contributor to The J Street Challenge. But some of us have a better grasp of reality and worship the concept of a free and secure Jewish State more than we worship peace.

    To date Israel has no peace partners among the Palestinian leadership. Abbas is clear about his refusal to recognize a secure Jewish State. Maybe a bit less bellicose and deceptive than the outright desire to destroy Israel as professed by Hamas but no less threatening. And no less unqualified as a negotiating partner.

    Pay very close attention to the wise words of Ruth Wisse, Daniel Gordis and Caroline Glick. They are not mesmerized by the allure of peace with those whose desire primarily is to destroy Israel. The J Street Challenge will be screened here in San Diego in June. Look for notices in the Jewish press. Come with an open mind and with your emotions sidelined. The existential threats to Israel can’t be mitigated by feel good platitudes about nonexistent peace partners.

    Reality is often very ugly. Obscuring the ugly truth will not make it disappear. Unfortunately, the ugly truth is that Israel has no Palestinian worth negotiating with at this time.

  2. Attacking J Street is NOT a waste of resources. The lies of J Street must be exposed. These modern day Kapos funded by George Soros are aligned with many groups who seek the destruction of Israel. Alan Dershowitz knows what he is talking about. Make sure that you view the movie “The J Street Challenge” before you decide to back J Street.

Comments are closed.