1 thought on “Contemporary Torah: Building belonging and creating sanctuary”

  1. What really jumps out is how many articles this author has published in such a short time: eight between February 4 and February 20. That pace alone makes you wonder how much original thinking is actually going into them, especially since the writing often reads like AI-generated text. It’s hard not to question credibility and trust when things start to feel mass-produced.
    Even more concerning is how these articles keep framing the Jewish community. Time and again, Jews are treated like a single, uniform group, with “Ashkenazi Jews” cast as a collective moral problem. That’s just not reality. Jewish identity is diverse, shaped by vastly different histories and experiences. Reducing it to a modern American racial category flattens centuries of lived experience, erasing real trauma from Russian pogroms, the Holocaust, Soviet-era oppression, and present-day antisemitism. Judaism existed long before today’s ideas of race even took shape, yet these pieces reinterpret Jewish history almost entirely through a U.S. racial lens. In doing so, they downplay antisemitism and recast Jews as perpetrators, rather than as a people with a long history of vulnerability and generational trauma, a tone that feels especially jarring when antisemitic hate crimes are at record highs. Orthodox and visibly Jewish individuals, many of whom are Ashkenazi, have been frequent targets in major antisemitism hate crime hotspots like New York.
    The most recent article continues this pattern and layers on confusing political messaging, including a line claiming that “nearly half the population of the USA” embraces an unnamed man (apparently Trump?) as offering a “joyful, unifying message of love and resilience.” That sentence doesn’t even make sense, either logically or factually.
    Overall, these articles offer a surface-level take on Jewish history, yet deliver it with a tone of self-assured moral judgment. Writing for a San Diego Jewish community publication should demand clarity, historical accuracy, and accountability, not a blending of political ideology, trauma language, and religious teaching into a story presented as unquestionable truth.

Comments are closed.