By Rabbi Dr. Israel Drazin

PIKESVILLE, Maryland — In the ninth weekly biblical portion, Matot (30:2-32:42), in chapter 31, the Israelites take vengeance against the nation of Midian for their attempt, described in the previous portion, to destroy the Israelites.
He explains that (1) the term “priest” here does not refer to the temple duty, (2) the translation “to the war” is incorrect, and (3) the correct translation should be, “Eleazer the priest for the war,” which is what is called today a military chaplain. He points out that the Israelites had military chaplains in Deuteronomy 20:2, where one of his functions is described, and in other wars.
Many nations used military chaplains before and after the time of Moses. Military chaplains provided spiritual and moral support to soldiers. The US Chaplain Corps was established on 29 July 1775 when the Continental Congress authorized one ordained Chaplain, serving at the rank of Captain, for each regular regiment of the Continental Army.
The 250th anniversary of the American chaplaincy is scheduled to occur in July 2025. The Continental Army needed clergy to provide religious support for the volunteers fighting for our Nation’s independence. The first chaplains were Protestants only.
I served on active duty in the Army as a military chaplain from 1957, at the age of 21, until several years later, then transitioned back to civilian life while remaining in the Army reserves. I rose in the reserves from First Lieutenant to Colonel. During these years, the Army paid for me to acquire two Master’s Degrees, a PhD, and a Law Degree. My primary role during the reserve years was working for the civil government as a lawyer, the head of Medicare’s Civil Litigation Staff. Additionally, in the reserves, I taught legal matters at the Chaplain school.
In 1979, two Harvard University law students filed a lawsuit against the United States Army for employing military chaplains as part of its personnel. They argued that the chaplaincy violated the Constitution’s mandate of separating church and state: “Congress shall make no law establishing religion or prohibiting the Free Exercise thereof.” The Army Chaplaincy noted that the Army JAG officers and U.S. attorneys assigned to the case at that time lacked an understanding of the chaplaincy.
I made a positive impression on the military as both a chaplain and a lawyer, and the Army recognized that I understood the issues in the case against it. The Army requested that I take leave from the Civil Service, return to active duty to assist in winning the lawsuit, and then return to the Civil Service after contributing to the case. I agreed. It was the most exciting years of my life.
I served four years at the Pentagon and did much more than work on the case. For example, I handled all matters involving religion and law, wrote documents for President Reagan and the Chief of Staff of the Army, and even settled a dispute between the Vatican and the US government. When we won the case, the president promoted me to Brigadier General in recognition of the work I had done, and I transitioned from Active Duty to Civil Service and the Army reserves.
However, during my four years as a general in the reserves, I was frequently called back to active duty to handle various matters, such as serving on a committee to address many issues where soldiers wanted to observe religious duties prohibited by the military, to argue the chaplaincy position regarding cutting the chaplaincy numbers with The Chief of Staff of the Miliary, to serve on boards that promote generals, and more. In the last instance, I ensured that the next Chief of Chaplains would be Black, the first and, so far, the last time this had happened.
*
Rabbi Dr. Israel Drazin is, as this article states, a retired brigadier general in the U.S. Army Chaplain Corps. He is the author of more than 50 books.