Orthodox vs. Reform, Conser’ive rhetoric heats up

By Rabbi Dow Marmur

Rabbi Dow Marmur
Rabbi Dow Marmur

JERUSALEM –One difference between a politician and a statesman/woman is that the former says what the audience wants to hear whereas the latter tells it as it is. Binyamin Netanyahu is a politician.

To be able to have a majority government he, like most of his predecessors, has given the Orthodox coalition members most of what they’ve demanded, including a franchise on religion in Israel to the virtual exclusion of Conservative and Reform Jews. However, to make nice to American Jewry that has mostly non-Orthodox leaders he affirmed religious pluralism when he addressed them in Washington the other day. They were told what they wanted to hear.

The Reform movement in Israel has naturally welcomed the kind-of-pledge Netanyahu made in Washington. The Orthodox politicians in Israel have already reacted with vehemence against it insisting that the prime minister is contravening the coalition agreement and thus jeopardizing his government.

According to Ya’akov Litzman, the minister of health, Reform and Conservative Jews are tearing apart the Jewish people. Moshe Gafni, the chair of the finance committee of the Knesset (who I think once trampled on a Reform prayer book on the Knesset podium) accused Conservative and Reform Jews of brandishing a knife against the Torah of Israel. Another Orthodox Knesset member repeated a statement by the minister responsible for religious affairs that Reform Jews aren’t Jews.

The leaders of Israeli Reform are used to the invective. But they normally find it more difficult to admit that the majority of the Israeli public that keeps away from all forms of religious Judaism, including its Conservative and Reform manifestations while believing that Orthodoxy is the sole authentic exponent of the faith of Israel. That’s why Israelis put up with, perhaps implicitly encourage, Orthodox excesses even while mouthing support for religious pluralism.

Without the indifference/implied support from the Israeli public the Orthodox parties wouldn’t be able to dominate. It’s, therefore, worth repeating that that’s probably why some leaders of Reform believe that the movement should address itself to the secular Jews, even by symbolically moving its offices from Jerusalem to Tel Aviv.

Those who disagree may argue that by turning to secular Israel, Reform would give credence to Orthodox canards and distance itself from the Conservative movement which still retains traditionalist ambitions (even though the traditionalists usually fail to differentiate between Reform and Conservative).

The underlying issue is, of course, the nature of Israel. Orthodox spokesmen maintain that it can only be a Jewish state if they’re allowed to shape its direction. Their opponents affirm that Israel must not only be Jewish but also democratic and democracy requires liberal religion and separation of religion and state. Current emergencies often obscure and delay the discussion, but sooner or later the matter will have to be resolved.

The founding prime minister of Israel David Ben Gurion was a statesman. He’s quoted to have stated that what matters isn’t what the Gentiles say but what the Jews do. To paraphrase him in this context: ultimately it doesn’t matter what the Orthodox say but what Reform and Conservative Jews do in Israel and everywhere else.

*
Marmur is spiritual leader emeritus of Holy Blossom Temple in Toronto.  He may be contacted via dow.marmur@sdjewishworld.com
*

ADL blasts United Torah Judaism’s comments about Reform Judaism

NEW YORK (Press Release) — The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) on Wednesday, Nov. 11, deplored statements by Knesset Members from the United Torah Judaism party who, in response to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s commitment to invest in Israel’s Reform and Conservative communities, responded by comparing these movements to terrorists and accused them of “tearing the Jewish people apart.”

“We deplore the continued slander and vitriol heaped on Reform and Conservative Judaism by members of Knesset and other Orthodox individuals and institutions as contrary to the principles upon which the State of Israel was founded,” said Jonathan A. Greenblatt, ADL CEO. “It only serves to deepen the fissures within Israel society and alienate committed Reform and Conservative Zionists around the word.”

Greenblatt added, “Even worse, these statements can be incitements to violence against Reform and Conservative Jews and their institutions, of which there are far too many examples.  We cannot tolerate this baseless hatred and we call upon Prime Minister Netanyahu unambiguously to reject the intolerant views expressed by members of his own coalition. We should be investing our energy in building Jewish unity, not destroying it.”

Ya’acov Litzman, who serves as Health Minister said, “Through the generations we have known that the Reform and Conservative are tearing the Jewish people apart and it is forbidden to lend them a hand to tear of the Torah of the Jewish people.” MK Moshe Gafni said, “The Reform [Movement] is sticking a knife into the Torah of the Jewish people.” This statement implicitly compared Reform Jews with the terrorists who have attacked and killed Jews on the streets of Israel in the last few weeks, among them a Reform Jew.

Yisrael Eichler accused American Jewish leaders of raising money for Israel and then funneling it to anti-Israel groups, a gross slander, and threatened to bring the government down over this issue.

ADL said that not only is this rhetoric hateful and dangerous in its own right, it distracts the entire government of Israel from the pressing issues at hand.

*
Preceding provided by the Anti-Defamation League

 

1 thought on “Orthodox vs. Reform, Conser’ive rhetoric heats up”

  1. While Marmur observes what to him is a problem in Israel, a mirror image problem exists in the States. From my observation point in the States, the Reform community, and some of the Conservative community, treat the Orthodox as a pariah, and if the Orthodox are Hasidic they openly show disgust. If Marmur feels slighted, how does he think the Orthodox in the US feel?
    I might add that when I attend a Conservative or Reform service, I hear a sermon on social or political issues. When I attend a service at an Orthodox congregation I hear a sermon based on the Parsha of the week. If a congregant cannot get some religious insight in shul where can he get it?
    –Jerome C Liner, Cincinnati, Ohio

Comments are closed.